Monday, November 17, 2014

★★★★☆ Rattle is inspired, if EMI and the CBSO keep this recording from competing with the best

Sibelius: Symphonies Nos. 4 and 6
I've wished for years that Rattle would release the Sibelius symphonies with the Berlin Philharmonic, and the wish will soon be fulfilled thanks to the orchestra's new label. It was only natural for me to head back to Rattle's earlier readings with the CBSO as prep work. And it's clear that Rattle is a gifted Sibelian. In his younger years, he was less concerned with refinement and orchestral beauty. To be candid, the lower playing standards of the CBSO can keep readings from being completely successful, even when Rattle is inspired on the podium. Ironic of course, as today one can guarantee impeccable virtuosity from the Berliners on every last release.

So it's no fault of Rattle's that the thrust of the strings at the start of the 4th Symphony is a far cry from Karajan's chilling intensity. Rattle's not guilty of over-refining this music or making it too polite. He's willing to be fully aggressive. At times, I think he's a little too forward, not quite brooding enough. And outside of the orchestra, EMI's sound is rather distant, so the music doesn't unfold before your eyes. I wish it would. But this is interesting music-making, and the finale has great passion, Rattle superseding his limitations.

I want the 6th Symphony to open with a wide open, misty feel. Once again, the orchestra and sonics are restricting, though I also wish for more bittersweet tugging from Rattle. Detail, nuance, and virtuosity go a long way in Sibelius, and there aren't here. Again, the irony is striking; now that in Berlin, Rattle can consistently dominate the field in those qualities. As it is, this is an enjoyable reading, and Rattle's involvement can't be questioned, if it falls short of the greats.

This is an encouraging disc, reminding us why Rattle has a reputation for Sibelius. We know that Rattle's new set is sure to set a new standard for playing and sound. Can it also be memorable for interpretive impact? Let's hope.


   

No comments:

Post a Comment